The Innocence Project only takes cases involving DNA evidence. Is this a miscarriage of justice itself?

The Innocence Project only takes cases involving DNA evidence. Is this a miscarriage of justice itself?

In other words, is it unfair they will not consider investigating other wrongful conviction cases? In 2-3 pages, write an argument, including the counterargument and rebuttal, making a case for or against the Innocence Project’s stance on only taking DNA cases. Use your readings and their website (https://www.innocenceproject.org/) as a starting point, but also include a minimum of 2 empirical or legal sources as well.