Expressly using Aristotle’s, or Abelard’s, or Nietzsche’s arguments of ethical values, explain why cellphones have – or have not – destroyed your generation.

Along with Ms Twenge’s article, you may certainly use personal experiences/examples, but they must be embedded within one of the three ethical frameworks listed above and outlined in your essay. 2.Pick at least two and no more than three of the first ten “technomoral virtues” as listed by Shannon Vallor to analyze for the reader. Then use them as ethical standards by which you argue for or against a particular technology in common use today. For example, you could pick Courage, Flexibility, and Perspective and then argue that internet television (or cell phones or surgical robots or driverless cars or…) encourages flexibility in certain ways and broadens perspective, but hinders courage. 3.“Ethical ideals as expressed by Aristotle or Abelard or Nietzsche are nothing more than empty rhetorical statements designed to defend the life or experiences of the person making that argument by claiming their personal experiences ought to be the standards for everyone.” Defend or refute this (nihilist) ethical argument that no widely accepted set of values exists. You may bring in other ethical systems (the Bible, Confucius, Siddhartha, “The Grand Inquisitor”…), but you must discuss either Aristotle or Abelard or Nietzsche as well.