Unit 7 Assignment – Financial Growth Proposal
Submit Assignment
- Due Sunday by 11:59pm
- Points 100
- Submitting a text entry box or a file upload
Estimated time to complete: 3 hours
Instructions
In the field of health care, one thing is for certain: innovation will continue to grow exponentially. “..Most of the innovations that healthcare leaders say they are excited about have less to do with medical advances and more to do with improving how health care is accessed, provided, and paid for in this country” (Phillips, 2015). Understanding how to support and move forward with this growth is essential for a health care manager.
Research and prepare a proposal to address the following health care topic/issue:
- An assisted living center wants to add a fitness studio, staffed by licensed Physical Therapists.
You will need to use a document template for this assignment. Templates may be found by searching Microsoft Word. A few examples include the “Business Plan” and “Project Scope Report” templates. You will need to edit the template headers to be applicable to this assignment, but retain the overall design elements to create a clean, professional-looking document.
Use the following outline within your template. Bolded items should be used as section headings. Additional subcategories may be included:
- Executive Summary
- Proposal Description
- Supporting documentation: basic financials (ex: purchase price, lease or buy options, average reimbursement rates, etc.)
- Market Assessment
- Utilization of the product or service
- Financial & Risk Analysis
- Provide a clear picture of revenues, expenses, profits, etc.
- How will the project be financed?
- What is the expected ROI?
- What is the financial risk? (include how risk is calculated)
- Recommendation
- Is this a viable option?
- How should the entity proceed?
- On a separate page, include a minimum of three references, in APA format.
Please review the rubric to ensure that your assignment meets criteria.
Submit:
- Financial Growth Proposal – Word document (.doc) or PDF
Reference: http://www.hfma.org/Leadership/E-Bulletins/2015/April/What_Will_Health_Care_Look_Like_in_5-15_Years_/ (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.
Rubric
HC306 – Unit 7 Assignment
HC306 – Unit 7 Assignment
| Criteria |
Ratings |
Pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent |
| 35.0 pts5
Demonstrates the ability to construct a clear and insightful problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of all relevant contextual factors. |
32.0 pts4
Demonstrates the ability to construct a problem statement, thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, and problem statement is adequately detailed. |
28.0 pts3
Begins to demonstrate the ability to construct a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, but problem statement is superficial. |
25.0 pts2
Demonstrates a limited ability in identifying a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement or related contextual factors. |
21.0 pts1
Demonstrates the ability to explain contextual facts but does not provide a defined statement. |
0.0 pts0
There is no evidence of a defined statement. |
|
35.0 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis |
| 45.0 pts5
Organizes and compares evidence to reveal insightful patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus. |
41.0 pts4
Organizes and interprets evidence to reveal patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus. |
36.0 pts3
Organizes and describes evidence according to patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus. |
31.0 pts2
Organizes evidence, but the organization is not effective in revealing patterns, differences, or similarities. |
27.0 pts1
Describes evidence, but it is not organized and/ or is unrelated to focus. |
0.0 pts0
Lists evidence, but it is not organized and/ or is unrelated to focus. |
|
45.0 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting |
| 10.0 pts5
The paper exhibits a excellent command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling. |
9.0 pts4
The paper exhibits a good command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, or spelling with minor grammatical errors that impair the flow of communication. |
8.0 pts3
The paper exhibits a basic command of written English language conventions. The paper has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impact the flow of communication. |
7.0 pts2
The paper exhibits a limited command of written English language conventions. The paper has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication. |
6.0 pts1
The paper exhibits little command of written English language conventions. The paper has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern meaning. |
0.0 pts0
The paper does not demonstrate command of written English language conventions. The paper has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader difficulty discerning the meaning. |
|
10.0 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA |
| 10.0 pts5
The required APA elements are all included with correct formatting, including in-text citations and references. |
9.0 pts4
The required APA elements are all included with minor formatting errors, including in-text citations and references. |
8.0 pts3
The required APA elements are all included with multiple formatting errors, including in-text citations and references. |
7.0 pts2
The required APA elements are not all included. AND/OR there are major formatting errors, including in-text citations and references. |
6.0 pts1
Several APA elements are missing. The errors in formatting demonstrate limited understanding of APA guidelines, in-text-citations, and references. |
0.0 pts0
There is little to no evidence of APA formatting. AND/OR there are no in-text citations AND/OR references. |
|
10.0 pts |
| Total Points: 100.0 |
