Analysis of expanding the voting rights to common men.

One of the main jobs of historians is to interpret the past by reviewing primary documents, scholarly secondary sources, and then creating an analysis of this research. After reading your text and reviewing the assigned materials, submit an analysis of expanding the voting rights to common men. Consider the following questions: Were the concerns about removing the property requirements legitimate? How did the expansion of suffrage impact this election? Why do you think the common man supported Andrew Jackson? What about him could they relate to? If voters believe the president was like them, how would this impact their view of that president and his presidency in general? During your lifetime, has someone run for president that the common men and women in the United States viewed as their own? Do candidates still use the common-man technique for campaigns? This assignment should be 500 words in length. For full credit, your paper must not simply sum up the reading or repeat points made there. Rather, I am looking for you to create your own interpretation, explain the emotional content of the piece, or discuss some original insight. Include Turabian-style citations as needed