Discuss the ineffectiveness of current tsunami warning system.


Notice: Trying to access array offset on value of type bool in /home/onliiuxo/public_html/wp-content/themes/betheme/functions/theme-functions.php on line 1490

Notice: Trying to access array offset on value of type bool in /home/onliiuxo/public_html/wp-content/themes/betheme/functions/theme-functions.php on line 1495

Discuss the ineffectiveness of current tsunami warning system.


Notice: Trying to access array offset on value of type bool in /home/onliiuxo/public_html/wp-content/themes/betheme/functions/theme-functions.php on line 1490

Notice: Trying to access array offset on value of type bool in /home/onliiuxo/public_html/wp-content/themes/betheme/functions/theme-functions.php on line 1495

This is a research paper with the thesis on “ineffective of current tsunami warning systems. I have attached the 3 papers you MUST discuss. This paper does not include an introduction, AT ALL!! Just start off with body paragraph one! The conclusion for this simply 2 to 3 sentences tying the the two paragraphs together! The paper is supposed to only have 2 body paragraphs with a total word count of 825 words!! The 2 body paragraphs: Body Paragraph 1 is to discuss the ineffectiveness of current tsunami warning system. This paragraph is based on the research paper titled “Designing Warning Systems for Natural Disasters in Thailand: A Preliminary Survey of Research Findings and Current Needs” attached below” and “Increasing the Effectiveness of Early Warning via Context-aware Alerting.” Both papers are attached below. Basically for paragraph one, You should elaborate why tsunami warnings were ineffective first than you can link your prescriptions on how to make them more effective all based on the two research papers. Body paragraph 2 is based on show the positive correlation between demographic factors and heightened mortality rates. This paragraph is based on research paper titled ” Tsunami mortality and displacement in Aceh province, Indonesia” This paragraph cannot be you just restating the numbers/ finding from the paper, you MUST explain your won thoughts regarding the evidence provided in paper.