Low-Quality and High-Quality After-Action Review


Notice: Trying to access array offset on value of type bool in /home/onliiuxo/public_html/wp-content/themes/betheme/functions/theme-functions.php on line 1490

Notice: Trying to access array offset on value of type bool in /home/onliiuxo/public_html/wp-content/themes/betheme/functions/theme-functions.php on line 1495

Low-Quality and High-Quality After-Action Review


Notice: Trying to access array offset on value of type bool in /home/onliiuxo/public_html/wp-content/themes/betheme/functions/theme-functions.php on line 1490

Notice: Trying to access array offset on value of type bool in /home/onliiuxo/public_html/wp-content/themes/betheme/functions/theme-functions.php on line 1495

“Low-Quality and High-Quality After-Action Review”

  • Create a scenario or event in an organization (i.e., safety,  training, or another issue) using a low-quality after-action review.  Next, speculate on the major negative effects within the organization if  the same scenario or event were to reoccur. Support your response with  at least two (2) examples of the identified negative effects.
  • Watch the video titled “AAR (After Action Review) Definition  & Explanation” (2 min 43 s), located in the online course shell. You  may also view the video at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2NI_P0JkC-8.  Next, using the reoccurrence of the scenario or event from part one of  the discussion, change the low-quality to a high-quality after-action  review. Then, suggest the most important lessons-learned using the  high-quality after-action review method as an adopted business practice.