Medical Ethics paper: Euthanasia and physician assisted suicide debate

MEDICAL ETHICS PAPER. I NEED AN ESSAY ABOUT THIS OUTLINE. NO NEED FOR COVER PAGE OR WHATSOEVER. I JUST NEED ANSWERS ON THE OUTLINE.

IV.Body Paragraph 3 -Arguments

There is often the issue of intention and foresight when deciding on whether to conduct euthanasia or physician assisted suicide. Some individuals agree with euthanasia and physician assisted suicide to relieve pain and suffering while

i.Individuals supporting Euthanasia and physician assisted suicide advocate for the said procedure to maintain patient’s autonomy

ii.Euthanasia and physician assisted suicide provides quality of life by ending the patient’s suffering and agony.

iii. Euthanasia and physician assisted suicide cuts the medical funds and can be used to other patients.

V.Body Paragraph 4 – Arguments

a. Transition: The issues of competence, autonomy and voluntarism in euthanasia have always raised concerns.

i.There a moral and religious arguments due to sanctity of life.

ii.The purpose of euthanasia and physician assisted suicide contradicts to the moral obligation of the physician.

iii.Patients are questioned regarding his sound of mind.

VI.Opinion and Conclusion

A.Transition: An individual can choose how to live their lives and nowadays they can express the option on how to die.

B.Different people can use euthanasia in the wrong way, which is illegal. Aid- in- dying is a phrase that is commonly used, and it is ambiguous as it does not show its underlying message. Ending one’s life is a long process that often involves a lot of people before it takes place.

APA STYLE. NEED IN TEXT CITATION