Scientific, mathematical/analtycal, ethical, cultural perspective of the neurological disorder relating to spinal cancers and tumor

The final discussion is a concluding argument revealing a “defensible solution” to the healthcare topic, supported by the “evidence” .introduction and discussion/conclusion.

• Scientific, mathematical/analtycal, ethical, cultural perspective of the neurological disorder relating to spinal cancers and tumor.  placing the perspectives in a strategic arrangement that supports the final paper, your argument for a “defensible solution” to the health care issue you have studied, researched, and written about. As a result, this final paper will be comprehensive and summative.
• Important: this final paper should include a newly composed introductory section, and a final conclusion section which presents your discussion of (and argument for) the solution. Your argument for the defensible solution that you propose should be the focus of this paper.

Your paper must:

• Be 15–20 pages in length
  • Title page (1 page)
  • Introduction (1–2 pages)
  • Reworked informative papers (10-15 pages)
  • Conclusion (1–2 pages)
  • References page (1–2 pages)
• Reference 12–15 scholarly, peer-reviewed resources (compiled by combining all of the references from your Perspective of Inquiry papers and any additional resources you use in this final paper.)
• Follow all APA formatting guidelines for this paper, with each of your previous four papers being presented as “sections” of this fifth paper, using Level 1 headings.
• Use the provided template.

Refer to the rubric for evaluation details and to assist in preparing the paper.