Selection and Recruitment Healthcare Plan
Notice: Trying to access array offset on value of type bool in /home/onliiuxo/public_html/wp-content/themes/betheme/functions/theme-functions.php on line 1490
Notice: Trying to access array offset on value of type bool in /home/onliiuxo/public_html/wp-content/themes/betheme/functions/theme-functions.php on line 1495
Selection and Recruitment Healthcare Plan
Notice: Trying to access array offset on value of type bool in /home/onliiuxo/public_html/wp-content/themes/betheme/functions/theme-functions.php on line 1490
Notice: Trying to access array offset on value of type bool in /home/onliiuxo/public_html/wp-content/themes/betheme/functions/theme-functions.php on line 1495
Scenario: You are a human resource director working in an integrated urban hospital. As a result of ongoing changes in the hiring process at your facility, your VP of HR has charged you with preparing a plan for supervisors to use when they recruit and select health care employees. Before you can prepare the plan, you must first analyze the challenges involved in the recruitment and selection of health care providers. You must also propose strategies to address those challenges.
In a 7- to 9- page report to the VP, address the following:
- Analyze three challenges (e.g., legal, ethical, moral, and operational) related to recruitment and three challenges associated with selection.
- Include a balance of information on both internal and external challenges, and explain how these challenges impact recruitment and selection.
- Explain the impact of failing to address these challenges on human resource functions and hospital performance management.
- Recommend sustainable strategic and tactical approaches to address the challenges associated with internal and external factors that affect recruitment and selection.
- Describe a strategic approach for each factor you identified and explain how this strategy will help mitigate the potential challenges inflicted by the particular internal or external challenges. Include best practices from other industries (e.g., information technology, hospitality) in your recommendation.
- Evaluate the efficiency and effectiveness of various recruitment sources and selection methods.
- Explain how information from other industries can inform recruitment and selection in the health care industry.
- Identify at least two recruitment sources that the human resource department should use and evaluate their efficiency and effectiveness.
- Identify at least two candidate selection processes that the human resource department should use and explain which is most effective and why.
Now that you have completed your analysis of recruitment and selection practices, you must write a plan for the recruitment and selection of health care employees that incorporates the strategies you explored. With the scenario in mind, develop a plan for the recruitment and selection of health care providers. Refer to the “Sample Recruitment Strategy Planning Template” in this week’s Learning Resources for guidance.
- Define at least three key objectives in developing an effective recruitment process.
- Explain, in detail, how recruitment will be conducted, outlining relevant components and steps in the recruitment process.
- Define at least two key objectives in developing an effective selection process.
- Explain how candidate selection will be conducted, outlining relevant components of and steps in the selection process.
Note: The report to the VP should be 7-9 pages, not including the title and reference pages. Refer to the “Sample Recruitment Strategy Planning Template” in this week’s Learning Resources for guidance. Consider using tables or graphs to help present your plan clearly. Your Assignment must be written in standard edited business English. See the rubric for additional requirements related to research and scholarly writing.
| EXCELLENT | GOOD | FAIR | POOR | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Challenges and Strategies for Recruitment and Selection Analysis of challenges related to recruitment and selection. | Points:
Points Range: 14 (14%) – 15 (15%) The analysis shows depth, breadth, and clarity in critical thinking when addressing more than three recruitment and three selection challenges. Feedback: |
Points:
Points Range: 13 (13%) – 13 (13%) The analysis fully addresses three recruitment and three selection challenges. Feedback: |
Points:
Points Range: 12 (12%) – 12 (12%) The analysis lacks depth, breadth, or clarity in critical thinking when addressing than three recruitment and three selection challenges. Feedback: |
Points:
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 11 (11%) The analysis does not address (zero points) or poorly addresses three recruitment and three selection challenges. Feedback: |
| Recommendations for strategic approaches to address the challenges related to recruitment and selection. | Points:
Points Range: 18 (18%) – 20 (20%) The recommendation of strategic approaches shows depth, breadth, and clarity in critical thinking when addressing the challenges related to recruitment and selection. Feedback: |
Points:
Points Range: 16 (16%) – 17 (17%) The recommendations of strategic approaches fully addresses the challenges related to recruitment and selection. Feedback: |
Points:
Points Range: 14 (14%) – 15 (15%) The recommendations of strategic approaches lack depth, breadth, or clarity in critical thinking when addressing challenges related to recruitment and selection. Feedback: |
Points:
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 13 (13%) The recommendations of strategic approaches do not address (zero points) or poorly addresses the challenges related to recruitment and selection Feedback: |
| Evaluation of recruitment sources and selection methods. | Points:
Points Range: 14 (14%) – 15 (15%) The evaluation of recruitment sources and selection methods shows depth, breadth, and clarity in critical thinking when addressing their efficiency and effectiveness. Feedback: |
Points:
Points Range: 13 (13%) – 13 (13%) The evaluation of recruitment sources and selection methods fully addresses their efficiency and effectiveness. Feedback: |
Points:
Points Range: 12 (12%) – 12 (12%) The evaluation of recruitment sources and selection methods lacks depth, breadth, and clarity in critical thinking when addressing their efficiency and effectiveness. Feedback: |
Points:
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 11 (11%) The evaluation of recruitment sources and selection methods does not address (zero points) or poorly addresses their efficiency and effectiveness. Feedback: |
| Recruitment and Selection Plans Objectives for developing an effective recruitment process. | Points:
Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) “Critical thinking is shown in the development of more than three key objectives for developing an effective recruitment process. The objectives are specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-oriented. ” Feedback: |
Points:
Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) The three key objectives effectively address the recruitment process. Feedback: |
Points:
Points Range: 3 (3%) – 3 (3%) Critical thinking is lacking in the development of more than three key objectives for developing an effective recruitment process. Feedback: |
Points:
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 2 (2%) The objectives are missing (zero points) or poorly address the recruitment process. Feedback: |
| Recruitment process. | Points:
Points Range: 9 (9%) – 10 (10%) The explanation of the recruitment process shows depth, breadth, and clarity in critical thinking. Feedback: |
Points:
Points Range: 8 (8%) – 8 (8%) The explanation fully addresses the recruitment process. Feedback: |
Points:
Points Range: 7 (7%) – 7 (7%) The explanation of the recruitment process lacks depth, breadth, and clarity in critical thinking. Feedback: |
Points:
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 6 (6%) The explanation is missing (zero points) or poorly addresses the recruitment process. Feedback: |
| Objectives for developing an effective selection process. | Points:
Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) “Critical thinking is shown in the development of more than three key objectives for developing an effective selection process. The objectives are specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-oriented. ” Feedback: |
Points:
Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) The three key objectives effectively address the selection process. Feedback: |
Points:
Points Range: 3 (3%) – 3 (3%) Critical thinking is lacking in the development of more than three key objectives for developing an effective selection process. Feedback: |
Points:
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 2 (2%) The objectives are missing (zero points) or poorly address the selection process. Feedback: |
| Selection Process | Points:
Points Range: 9 (9%) – 10 (10%) The explanation of the selection process shows depth, breadth, and clarity in critical thinking. Feedback: |
Points:
Points Range: 8 (8%) – 8 (8%) The explanation fully addresses the selection process. Feedback: |
Points:
Points Range: 7 (7%) – 7 (7%) The explanation of the selection process lacks depth, breadth, and clarity in critical thinking. Feedback: |
Points:
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 6 (6%) The explanation is missing (zero points) or poorly addresses the selection process. Feedback: |
| Writing | Points:
Points Range: 18 (18%) – 20 (20%) The report is well organized, uses business tone, contains original writing and proper paraphrasing, contains very few or no writing and/or spelling errors, and is fully consistent with graduate level writing style. The work is supported by the Learning Resources and more than three additional scholarly sources. The report is 7- to 9- pages plus a title and a reference page. Feedback: |
Points:
Points Range: 16 (16%) – 17 (17%) The report is mostly consistent with graduate level writing style and may have some spelling, and writing errors. The work is supported by the Learning Resources and at least three additional scholarly sources. The report is 7- to 9- pages plus a title and a reference page. Feedback: |
Points:
Points Range: 14 (14%) – 15 (15%) The report is somewhat consistent with graduate level writing style and may have some spelling, and writing errors. The work is supported by the Learning Resources and less than three additional scholarly sources. The report is not 7- to 9- pages plus a title and a reference page. Feedback: |
Points:
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 13 (13%) The report is well below graduate level writing style expectations for organization, business tone, and writing, or shows heavy reliance on quoting. The work is not supported by the Learning Resources or additional scholarly sources. The report is not 7- to 9- pages plus a title and a reference page. |
