Why do historians consider the Roman Empire after Pax Romana to 235 AD to be one of military monarchy and poor relations with the Senate?

Why do historians consider the Roman Empire after Pax Romana to 235 AD to be one of military monarchy and poor relations with the Senate?

Study the Roman Empire after Pax Romana to 235 AD. Why do historians consider this period to be one of military monarchy and poor relations with the Senate? Do you believe this was a period of provincial upsurge and orientalization of the Roman Empire? Why or why not?

Related posts

July 4, 2022

Appraise economical aspects that influence healthcare delivery systems.

Read more
July 4, 2022

Why do you think so many hospital/healthcare administrators have difficulty understanding statistical methods used in healthcare research?

Read more