Why do historians consider the Roman Empire after Pax Romana to 235 AD to be one of military monarchy and poor relations with the Senate?
Notice: Trying to access array offset on value of type bool in /home/onliiuxo/public_html/wp-content/themes/betheme/functions/theme-functions.php on line 1490
Notice: Trying to access array offset on value of type bool in /home/onliiuxo/public_html/wp-content/themes/betheme/functions/theme-functions.php on line 1495
Why do historians consider the Roman Empire after Pax Romana to 235 AD to be one of military monarchy and poor relations with the Senate?
Notice: Trying to access array offset on value of type bool in /home/onliiuxo/public_html/wp-content/themes/betheme/functions/theme-functions.php on line 1490
Notice: Trying to access array offset on value of type bool in /home/onliiuxo/public_html/wp-content/themes/betheme/functions/theme-functions.php on line 1495
Study the Roman Empire after Pax Romana to 235 AD. Why do historians consider this period to be one of military monarchy and poor relations with the Senate? Do you believe this was a period of provincial upsurge and orientalization of the Roman Empire? Why or why not?
