World War II newspaper article from the perspective of a German soldier

Notice: Trying to access array offset on value of type bool in /home/onliiuxo/public_html/wp-content/themes/betheme/functions/theme-functions.php on line 1490

Notice: Trying to access array offset on value of type bool in /home/onliiuxo/public_html/wp-content/themes/betheme/functions/theme-functions.php on line 1495

Knowing the stories behind the people in World War II, write a newspaper article of from the perspective of one of the people during that time.

You can choose to write from the perspective of one of the following characters:
- a German soldier
- a Japanese-American citizen
- a Russian soldier
- an American woman working to support the troops
- a British citizen living in London during the bombings, or
- a Government Official making decisions about their country’s activity in the war
What do you want the rest of the world to know about your experience as that person during WWII?
Explain why you think the way you do as that person.

Make sure you use evidence to support the facts and actual events referenced in your article.

Estimated time to complete: 2 hours

Rubric

HU240 Unit 2 Assessment – Newspaper Article

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent

27.0 ptsLevel 5

Expresses content knowledge with the assignment purpose in a complete, organized, clear, professional, and culturally respectful manner.

24.0 ptsLevel 4

Expresses content knowledge with the assignment purpose in a complete, organized, clear, professional, and culturally respectful manner with minor weaknesses in one or more of the areas.

22.0 ptsLevel 3

Partially expresses content knowledge with the assignment purpose. Expresses ideas in a complete, organized, clear, professional, and culturally respectful manner with weaknesses in these area.

19.0 ptsLevel 2

Partially expresses content knowledge with the assignment purpose. Ideas are partially expressed in an organized, professional, and culturally respectful manner with major weaknesses in these areas.

16.0 ptsLevel 1

Expresses limited content knowledge with the assignment purpose. Ideas are not expressed in a complete, organized, clear, professional, and/or culturally respectful manner.

0.0 ptsLevel 0

The assignment was not completed or there are no constructed concepts that demonstrate analytically skills and no evidences to support the content does not align to the assignment instructions

27.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis

27.0 ptsLevel 5

Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating strong analytical skills with strong evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.

24.0 ptsLevel 4

Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating strong analytical skills with evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.

22.0 ptsLevel 3

Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating analytical skills with some evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.

19.0 ptsLevel 2

Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating weak analytical skills with minimal evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.

16.0 ptsLevel 1

Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating inadequate evidence of analytical skills. There is minimal or no evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.

0.0 ptsLevel 0

The assignment was not completed or there was no evidence of constructed concepts that are supported by professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.

27.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTechnology

15.0 ptsLevel 5

Manipulates multiple technological resources to effectively implement all assignment requirements.

14.0 ptsLevel 4

Manipulates multiple technological resources to effectively implement most assignment requirements.

12.0 ptsLevel 3

Manipulates multiple technological resources to effectively implement some assignment requirements.

11.0 ptsLevel 2

Manipulates multiple technological resources for some assignment requirements.

9.0 ptsLevel 1

Manipulates technological resources to minimally meet some assignment requirements.

0.0 ptsLevel 0

The assignment was not completed or difficulties with technological manipulation were evident. The assignment submitted does not meet requriements.

15.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting

10.0 ptsLevel 5

The assignment exhibits a excellent command of written English language conventions. The assignment has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling.

9.0 ptsLevel 4

The assignment exhibits a good command of written English language conventions. The assignment has no errors in mechanics, or spelling with minor grammatical errors that impair the flow of communication.

8.0 ptsLevel 3

The assignment exhibits a basic command of written English language conventions. The assignment has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impact the flow of communication

7.0 ptsLevel 2

The assignment exhibits a limited command of written English language conventions. The assignment has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication.

6.0 ptsLevel 1

The assignment exhibits little command of written English language conventions. The assignment has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern meaning.

0.0 ptsLevel 0

The assignment does not demonstrate command of written English language conventions. The assignment has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader difficulty discerning the meaning.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA

6.0 ptsLevel 5

In-text citations of sources and references in proper APA style are included with no errors.

5.0 ptsLevel 4

In-text citations of sources and references in proper APA style are included but have 1-2 minor APA errors.

4.0 ptsLevel 3

In-text citations of sources and references in proper APA style are included but have 3 – 4 minor APA errors.

3.0 ptsLevel 2

In-text citations of sources and references in proper APA style are included but have more than 4 errors.

2.0 ptsLevel 1

The errors demonstrate limited understanding of in-text citation and reference requirements

0.0 ptsLevel 0

There are no in-text citations AND/OR references.

6.0 pts

Total Points: 85.0

World War II newspaper article from the perspective of a German soldier

World War II newspaper article from the perspective of a German soldier

Rubric

Related posts

Appraise economical aspects that influence healthcare delivery systems.

Why do you think so many hospital/healthcare administrators have difficulty understanding statistical methods used in healthcare research?